I don't understand deriving satisfaction from having the latest or greatest when it comes to gadgets. My approach is: I'm not rich. I don't have a lot of money that I don't know what to do with. Anything that costs over $50 gets analyzed to its usefulness and how much I need or want said item. When considering buying electronics, I do a good deal of research so I know what it is I would like to get. Know what features are important to me and which are not. If there is a particular model of an item that I want, I save for that model. I'd rather wait and save for the item that I really want then get something that isn't really what I wanted. Because I have solid reasons for getting a particular item, have probably saved for a while to have it, I find I'm usually satisfied with it for a long, long time. A new model comes out and it doesn't diminish the value I put on the item I already own. If an item breaks or it no longer serves the purpose for which I got it, then I look into replacing it. I read to see what options are out there and what is important to me.
In general, I try to avoid talking to people about material possessions. I especially avoid it with people who have the attitude that I mentioned at the start of this post. I try to remain satisfied and appreciative with what I have. I can't understand when people are always dissatisfied with what they have materially. Especially when if they really thought about it, there are people who can't afford the old model and would be grateful just to have that, let alone the latest.
Anyway, so this has been on my mind off and on for a long time. Thank you to those who read through it and let me rant.